Artificial Intelligence (AI) has arrived—and it's not just penning poems for my daughter anymore. From advisory boards to site offices, AI is edging into our workflows, whispering promises of insight, automation, and foresight. But for the project controls professional, grounded in precision and governed by tangible outcomes, one question keeps surfacing: Is AI practically useful now, or still trapped in a cycle of hype? My view? It’s here in narrow but powerful ways—and it’s changing how we think about effectiveness, risk, and delivery certainty. But we need to move past awe or anxiety and start using it with clarity and purpose.
AI is not a singular monolithic technology—it’s a family of systems with different applications:
Most of the AI tools in project environments today sit in the predictive or embedded generative category.
Before getting starry-eyed about toolkits, it’s worth anchoring on how AI can improve project control outcomes. Some high-impact uses include:
Each of these aims at a familiar outcome: less rework, better foresight, and fewer surprises.
Let’s group the available tools to make sense of what’s really out there:
These integrate predictive or generative AI into project delivery tools.
These aren't built for projects but can be adapted with prompting frameworks.
For organizations investing in tech stacks, this includes:
To unlock real value from generative AI—especially the general-purpose kind—we need better prompts. Here’s a simple structure I find helpful:
Example prompt:
"Act as a senior risk analyst reviewing a $2B transport megaproject. Identify the top three drivers of schedule overrun based on these indicators. Present in a one-page executive summary.” This improves output quality and helps establish trust by reducing ambiguity.
Let’s be honest: “The bots aren’t taking your job” isn’t the whole story. Repetitive tasks, data analysis, even communications—these are already being transformed. Job functions will shift. Roles will be redefined. And yes, for some, that will mean disruption. But for most professionals, the opportunity lies in augmentation—freeing up time from grunt work to focus on strategic judgment, stakeholder alignment, and value engineering.
We’re still early in the curve. The real disruption will come from:
We need more professionals who can curate and interpret AI output, not just consume it. That’s where leadership lies.
I use AI every day—not because it’s trendy, but because it’s useful. Whether simulating risk, summarizing board papers, or translating technical insights into plain English, it helps me deliver better. We don’t need to blindly follow hype. But we also shouldn’t wait until the tools are perfect. Let’s lead—critically, intentionally, and transparently. Now is the time to shape how AI is adopted in project controls—not after it’s shaped us.